Table of contents:
225/60 R17 Nokian WR Snowproof P variants
No
No
Nokian WR Snowproof P is a winter tyre made in total of 55 sizes, ranging from R17 to R17 - this particular dimension is R17, which means it fits to a 17 inch/431.8mm diameter wheel. 225/60 R17 is 20mm wider than the narrowest dimension (205) and 20mm narrower than the widest one (245). This tyre profile of 60 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 60% of the tyre width (225mm), which results in 135mm sidewall height. In 225/60 R17, WR Snowproof P usually competes against Snowprox S954, which is a tyre from Toyo with a rating of 43%, compared to 44% of the Nokian in question.
Nokian WR Snowproof P is made in 55 sizes, starting from 205/45 R17 up to 245/35 R21.
Similar tires
Nokian WR Snowproof P in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (225/60 R17)
Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2022 225/45 R17
recommended for economical driving
Ranked #4 of 8
Securing 4th place out of 8 in the competition, the Nokian WR Snowproof P was awarded the rating of 'Recommended for economical driving.' The tire showcased impressive performance on dry surfaces with its instant steering response, high lateral acceleration, and the shortest braking distances in its class. It also stood out for its very low rolling resistance, which put its competitors to shame. Furthermore, it took the lead in dry braking, exterior noise, comfort, and rolling resistance, highlighting its strengths in these areas. However, its performance during wet conditions revealed some weaknesses, including moderate deceleration, delayed steering response, weak traction, and early signs of aquaplaning. On snow-covered roads, despite some objective traction disadvantages, the Snowproof P was predictable at the limit, although its overall grip did not reach the top level.
recommended for economical driving
Ranked #4 of 8
Securing 4th place out of 8 in the competition, the Nokian WR Snowproof P was awarded the rating of 'Recommended for economical driving.' The tire showcased impressive performance on dry surfaces with its instant steering response, high lateral acceleration, and the shortest braking distances in its class. It also stood out for its very low rolling resistance, which put its competitors to shame. Furthermore, it took the lead in dry braking, exterior noise, comfort, and rolling resistance, highlighting its strengths in these areas. However, its performance during wet conditions revealed some weaknesses, including moderate deceleration, delayed steering response, weak traction, and early signs of aquaplaning. On snow-covered roads, despite some objective traction disadvantages, the Snowproof P was predictable at the limit, although its overall grip did not reach the top level.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 147 | 143 | 147 | ||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 84 | 143 | 129 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1102 | 301,21 | 501,21 | 202,4 | 109,6 | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 1064 | 283,16 | 469,56 | 201,5 | 109,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 3,3 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
