Segment
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than Linglong (39%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Linglong Sport Master, the rating is the same - 73%. The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Intensa UHP 2 and the Sport Master were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.312. Linglong Sport Master 11.67
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
1. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 72 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
Show test details |