check Norauto Prevensys 4 availability
Table of contents:
Performance Analysis: Norauto Prevensys 4
This graph shows how the tyre ranks across different properties compared to other tested tyres. Higher percentile means better performance - 100% means better than every tyre in every test, 0% means worse than every tyre in every test.
Timeline
Sizes
Similar tires
Comparison: tyres similar to Norauto Prevensys 4
Norauto Prevensys 4 in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Norauto Prevensys 4 was featured:All tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Norauto Prevensys 4 | 2,5 | 3,93 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #26 of 50
Finishing 26th out of 50 competitors, the Norauto Prevensys 4 achieved a final rating of 'Good'. The tire demonstrated notable strength on wet surfaces, offering good grip and precise handling, leading to positive assessments in wet conditions. Despite these strengths, the tire faced criticism for its performance on dry roads, exhibiting noticeable weaknesses such as insufficient balance and a tendency for the vehicle to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. Although it was possible to prevent skidding with skilled steering, these drawbacks led to a downgrade in its safety rating on dry surfaces. Further critiques were directed at its environmental impact, particularly its lower-than-average lifespan and significant wear, which notably affected its environmental rating. While the tire's efficiency was somewhat redeemed by lower fuel consumption and weight, these factors could not fully offset the noted deficiencies, resulting in a mixed overall assessment.
good
Ranked #26 of 50
Finishing 26th out of 50 competitors, the Norauto Prevensys 4 achieved a final rating of 'Good'. The tire demonstrated notable strength on wet surfaces, offering good grip and precise handling, leading to positive assessments in wet conditions. Despite these strengths, the tire faced criticism for its performance on dry roads, exhibiting noticeable weaknesses such as insufficient balance and a tendency for the vehicle to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. Although it was possible to prevent skidding with skilled steering, these drawbacks led to a downgrade in its safety rating on dry surfaces. Further critiques were directed at its environmental impact, particularly its lower-than-average lifespan and significant wear, which notably affected its environmental rating. While the tire's efficiency was somewhat redeemed by lower fuel consumption and weight, these factors could not fully offset the noted deficiencies, resulting in a mixed overall assessment.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Norauto Prevensys 4 | 3,0 | 3,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 95% (1x) | 65% (1x) |
|---|---|
| Good | Sufficient |
| 1x | 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R16 | R18 |
|---|---|
| 95% (1x) | 65% (1x) |
Ratings x Width
| 205/xx Rxx | 225/xx Rxx |
|---|---|
| 95% (1x) | 65% (1x) |
