Kleber Dynaxer HP4
The Dynaxer HP4 is a balanced tyre, but some of the tests criticize it's worse mileage and wet performance. For a lower price, it could be a good option.
check Kleber Dynaxer HP4 availability
Table of contents:
Pros and cons
- Low drive-by noise levels
- Below average aquaplaning resistance
- Poor handling on the wet
- Low mileage
- Poor handling on dry roads
Customer Popularity
84%
Customer Popularity
Based on 49 reviews
What customers like ...
-
Price 14
-
Quality 10
-
Low noise 7
-
Longevity 4
-
Brand trust 6
What customers dislike ...
-
Made in China/Romania 3
-
High balance weight needed 2
-
Limited mileage to judge 3
Comparison
Wet road
Fulda EcoControl HP2 105%
Maxxis Premitra HP5 105%
Toyo Proxes Comfort 105%
Firestone Roadhawk 100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 100%
Dry road - safety
Fulda EcoControl HP2 110%
Maxxis Premitra HP5 105%
Toyo Proxes Comfort 105%
Firestone Roadhawk 100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 100%
Dry road - sportiness
Toyo Proxes Comfort 125%
Firestone Roadhawk 120%
Fulda EcoControl HP2 105%
Maxxis Premitra HP5 105%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 100%
Mileage
Aquaplaning
Achievements
Best
Exterior noise
Autobild 2024
Adac 2023
Adac 2021
Autobild 2021
+1
Best
Aquaplaning - cross
Adac 2023
Best
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Adac 2023
Best
Dry braking
Adac 2023
Best
Comfort
Autobild 2022
Best
Wet braking
Adac 2023
Timeline
2019
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was launched
2020
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 1x (ACE)
2021
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 3x (Autobild,...)
2022
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 5x (GTÜ,...) and won the GTÜ 195/55 R16 test.
2023
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 1x (ADAC)
2024
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 2x (Autobild,...)
Sizes
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is made in 120 sizes, starting from 155/65 R14 up to 235/55 R17.
14"
15"
16"
◀
▶
Similar tires
Comparison: tyres similar to Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was featured:All tests
Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #13 of 20
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 13th place among 20 competitors in the evaluation, receiving a final rating of 'Good'. This tyre was noted for its excellent aquaplaning safety and short braking distances on dry surfaces, alongside superior rolling comfort. However, it was also criticized for its understeering handling characteristics and only moderate longevity. Highlighting its strengths, the tyre excelled particularly in the areas of comfort and exterior noise, standing out as the best performer in these disciplines. Despite its weaknesses, these qualities make it a considerable option for those prioritizing safety and comfort.
good
Ranked #13 of 20
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 13th place among 20 competitors in the evaluation, receiving a final rating of 'Good'. This tyre was noted for its excellent aquaplaning safety and short braking distances on dry surfaces, alongside superior rolling comfort. However, it was also criticized for its understeering handling characteristics and only moderate longevity. Highlighting its strengths, the tyre excelled particularly in the areas of comfort and exterior noise, standing out as the best performer in these disciplines. Despite its weaknesses, these qualities make it a considerable option for those prioritizing safety and comfort.
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #12 of 50
Finishing 12th out of 50 competitors, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 tire achieved a rating of "Good" in environmental performance aspects, demonstrating strong results for its lifespan, wear, and efficiency. However, it was noted for not being entirely balanced, with particular weaknesses observed on wet road conditions, which led to a downgrade in its assessment. On dry roads, the tire provided average steering feedback and could benefit from increased stability during dynamic evasive maneuvers. Although its braking distance on dry roads was considered good, it narrowly missed receiving a top rating in this area. The tire performed satisfactorily in aquaplaning tests and braking distance on wet roads but lacked grip and precision for a better evaluation in wet conditions. Despite these shortcomings, the Dynaxer HP4 stood out for its positive environmental impact, attributed to good projected mileage and low levels of wear and fuel consumption, although it marginally missed a higher rating due to its weight.
good
Ranked #12 of 50
Finishing 12th out of 50 competitors, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 tire achieved a rating of "Good" in environmental performance aspects, demonstrating strong results for its lifespan, wear, and efficiency. However, it was noted for not being entirely balanced, with particular weaknesses observed on wet road conditions, which led to a downgrade in its assessment. On dry roads, the tire provided average steering feedback and could benefit from increased stability during dynamic evasive maneuvers. Although its braking distance on dry roads was considered good, it narrowly missed receiving a top rating in this area. The tire performed satisfactorily in aquaplaning tests and braking distance on wet roads but lacked grip and precision for a better evaluation in wet conditions. Despite these shortcomings, the Dynaxer HP4 stood out for its positive environmental impact, attributed to good projected mileage and low levels of wear and fuel consumption, although it marginally missed a higher rating due to its weight.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 61 | 48 | 17 | 8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #13 of 21
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 12th spot among 21 competitors in a notable performance evaluation. This tire stood out for its excellent aquaplaning characteristics, short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, commendable driving comfort, and its notably quiet rolling noise. However, it did present some challenges, including moderate grip on wet roads, noticeably delayed steering response, and a tendency to understeer on dry roads. In terms of areas where this tire truly excelled, it was unmatched in terms of comfort. Despite these mixed outcomes, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 demonstrated a blend of strengths that could make it a consideration for drivers valuing safety and comfort.
satisfactory
Ranked #13 of 21
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 12th spot among 21 competitors in a notable performance evaluation. This tire stood out for its excellent aquaplaning characteristics, short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, commendable driving comfort, and its notably quiet rolling noise. However, it did present some challenges, including moderate grip on wet roads, noticeably delayed steering response, and a tendency to understeer on dry roads. In terms of areas where this tire truly excelled, it was unmatched in terms of comfort. Despite these mixed outcomes, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 demonstrated a blend of strengths that could make it a consideration for drivers valuing safety and comfort.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Summer tyre test 2021 225/50 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #11 of 17
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 finished 11th among 17 competitors, achieving a final rating of 'Satisfactory'. Praised for its good performance on dry surfaces and its ability to maintain grip and control even at the limit, braking in dry conditions was identified as one of its strengths. However, it did show a noticeable decline with increasing tire temperature. The tire struggled in wet conditions, failing to impress in any specific area and receiving a lower rating for handling. It was criticized for its weak grip and significant loss of lateral support during acceleration and braking, which led to a downgrade due to its only satisfactory performance in wet conditions. The Dynaxer HP4 was particularly noted for having average rolling noise levels and performed slightly better than average in terms of fuel consumption. It received a decent score for wear, indicating slightly higher than expected wear rates. Among the disciplines evaluated, the tire was unsurpassed in exterior noise, indicating its proficiency in minimizing noise pollution.
satisfactory
Ranked #11 of 17
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 finished 11th among 17 competitors, achieving a final rating of 'Satisfactory'. Praised for its good performance on dry surfaces and its ability to maintain grip and control even at the limit, braking in dry conditions was identified as one of its strengths. However, it did show a noticeable decline with increasing tire temperature. The tire struggled in wet conditions, failing to impress in any specific area and receiving a lower rating for handling. It was criticized for its weak grip and significant loss of lateral support during acceleration and braking, which led to a downgrade due to its only satisfactory performance in wet conditions. The Dynaxer HP4 was particularly noted for having average rolling noise levels and performed slightly better than average in terms of fuel consumption. It received a decent score for wear, indicating slightly higher than expected wear rates. Among the disciplines evaluated, the tire was unsurpassed in exterior noise, indicating its proficiency in minimizing noise pollution.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 45 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 100% (1x) | 95% (1x) | 85% (5x) | 75% (1x) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highly recommended | Good | Good | Satisfactory | Conditionally recommended |
| 1x | 1x | 1x | 4x | 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R16 | R17 |
|---|---|
| 90% (5x) | 81.7% (3x) |
Ratings x Width
| 195/xx Rxx | 205/xx Rxx | 215/xx Rxx | 225/xx Rxx |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% (1x) | 88.3% (3x) | 81.7% (3x) | 85% (1x) |
