Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing two popular summer tyres, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and Sava Intensa UHP 2, it's clear that both excel in different areas, rated at 78% by our experts. Both tyres are noted for their comforting features and the ability to deal with exterior noise.
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4, more details here, is praised for its good aquaplaning characteristics, short braking distances on both wet and dry conditions, good ride comfort, and quiet rolling noise as noted by Autobild. It does fall short with moderate grip in wet conditions and delayed steering response. In the ADAC test, the tyre held position 11 out of a total 17 tyres tested due to its good dry performance but minor struggles with increased wear and weaknesses on wet surfaces. This tyre has not been replaced and is currently produced by Kleber.
On the other side of the ring is the Sava Intensa UHP 2. Succeeding Sava Intensa UHP, the new model can be reviewed here. It has shown excellent safety reserves during aquaplaning, stable handling on dry surfaces, short braking distances in both wet and dry conditions, good comfort, and an attractive price. However, its downsides include slightly limited mileage. In an ADAC test, it took 12th position for satisfactory performance on dry roads and relative quietness, but it had minor struggles with increased wear and weaknesses on wet surfaces. The ACE test placed this Sava Tyre in 2nd place due to its superior dry handling and minimal noise, among other positive features.
Considering the test results, while both the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and Sava Intensa UHP 2 are strong competitors, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 takes the overall lead due to its strong summer performance and enhanced safety features.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.312. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 45 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||