Comparison: Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Goodride (49%). In this particular case, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 has a better rating of 82% compared to 49% of the Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57. The first tyre test of Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Zuper Ace SA-57 and the Dynaxer HP4 were tested.

#	Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 /49%	Kleber Dynaxer HP4 /82%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions		R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57

/49%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

/82%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R17

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 120

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 ?

Number of tests

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 2x

Best position in test

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 18.

Worst position in test

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 22.

Average position in tests

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 20

Year of the last test

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 2022

Best rating in test

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Satisfactory

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
68%

Goodride
Zuper Ace SA-57
64%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 78%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 70%

Wet handling

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 64%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 55%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 73%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 66%

Wet braking

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 69%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 57%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 65%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
73%

Goodride
Zuper Ace SA-57
60%

Price/value

1. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 90%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 75%

Rolling resistance

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 78%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 51%

Mileage

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 67%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 38%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
80%

Goodride
Zuper Ace SA-57
71%

Comfort

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 80%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 66%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 80%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 76%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ? dB

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 ? dB

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
69%

Goodride
Zuper Ace SA-57
68%

Dry braking

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 71%

2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 69%

Dry handling

1. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 67%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 66%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1+
Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+
Show test details

Comparison: Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands