Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Fulda (59%). In this particular case, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 has a better rating of 82% compared to 51% of the Fulda EcoControl HP. The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EcoControl HP and the Dynaxer HP4 were tested.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP 69 dB
