Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. DoubleCoin DC99 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (DoubleCoin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than DoubleCoin (1%). The first tyre test of DoubleCoin DC99 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the DC99 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | DoubleCoin DC99 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. DoubleCoin DC99 Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. DoubleCoin DC99 38.67
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. DoubleCoin DC99 ? dB2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ? dB
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
DoubleCoin DC99 | 39,6 | 42,1 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
DoubleCoin DC99 | 1 | ||||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
DoubleCoin DC99 Rating: Poor | 1,7 | ||||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
Show test details |