GT radial Sport Active 2 is a summer tyre made in total of 20 sizes, ranging from R16 to R16 - this particular dimension is R19, which means it fits to a 19 inch/482.6mm diameter wheel. 225/45 R19 is 30mm wider than the narrowest dimension (195) and 40mm narrower than the widest one (265). This tyre profile of 45 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 45% of the tyre width (225mm), which results in 101.25mm sidewall height. In 225/45 R19, there is only one possible speed index for GT radial Sport Active 2 - "Y", which is good for speeds up to 300 km/h. In 225/45 R19, radial Sport Active 2 usually competes against Ventus S1 evo3 K127, which is a tyre from Hankook with a rating of 74%, compared to 44% of the GT in question.
Autobild Summer tyre test 2023 225/45 R18 good Ranked #4 of 20Securing a commendable 4th position among 20 competitors, the GT Radial Sport Active 2 emerged with a "Good" final rating. This tyre impressed with its secure handling on both wet and dry surfaces and was particularly noted for its excellent aquaplaning resistance. Moreover, its competitive pricing contributed to a favorable cost-performance ratio. However, it did show some weaknesses, including moderate lateral grip on wet roads, which is something potential buyers might want to consider. Despite this drawback, the GT Radial Sport Active 2 stands out as a solid choice for drivers seeking reliable performance across various conditions without breaking the bank.
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 225/45 R18 not recommended Ranked #10 of 11The GT radial Sport Active 2 finished 10th out of 11 competitors, receiving a final rating of 'Not recommended.' This evaluation was due to its commendable aquaplaning qualities, showcasing superior performance in both cross and longitudinal aquaplaning disciplines. However, its performance was hindered by a low grip level on wet surfaces, moderate lateral support, and understeering during wet handling. Furthermore, it exhibited significantly prolonged wet braking distances alongside a delayed steering response and moderate rolling comfort, all of which contributed to its lower ranking in the competition. Despite its strengths in managing aquaplaning, these drawbacks were pivotal in shaping the overall assessment.