18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
Apollo Alnac 4G

Apollo Alnac 4G

Summer
Lowcost
3.9 /10 Conditionally recommended

What we know so far

Apollo Alnac 4G is a new tyre. Type: Summer; segment: budget. Because there are not enough full comparative results yet, the page avoids a scored verdict and focuses on facts already present in the database: 28 available sizes from R14 to R17.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Compare all →

See how this tyre stacks up against its closest rivals across all tested properties

ApolloThis tyre
Alnac 4G
3.9
SemperitBudget
Speed-Life 3
5.5
Better at: Wet braking, Wet handling
Worse at: Mileage
MatadorBudget
Hectorra 5
2.2
Better at: Rolling resistance, Dry handling
Worse at: Wet braking, Aquaplaning - longitudal
TomketBudget
Sport
2.3
Better at: Dry handling
Worse at: Aquaplaning - cross, Comfort
SavaBudget
Intensa UHP 2
6.5
Better at: Dry handling, Aquaplaning - cross
Worse at: Mileage
NexenBudget
N fera Sport
7.2
Better at: Dry braking, Wet braking
Worse at: Mileage, Rolling resistance
DoubleCoinBudget
DC99
Worse at: Dry braking, Wet braking
FuldaBudget
EcoControl HP2
7.4
Better at: Aquaplaning - cross, Mileage
Worse at: Wet braking, Wet handling
PetlasBudget
Imperium PT515
5.1
Better at: Mileage
Worse at: Wet handling, Wet braking
BridgestonePremium
Turanza T005
8.8
Better at: Rolling resistance, Dry handling
Worse at: Exterior noise, Mileage
UniroyalUpper-middle
RainSport 5
6.9
Better at: Aquaplaning - cross, Wet braking
Worse at: Mileage, Dry driving behavior
NokianUpper-middle
WetProof
6.6
Better at: Dry braking, Wet braking
Worse at: Mileage
GoodyearPremium
Efficient Grip Performance
5.0
Better at: Dry handling, Dry braking
KumhoUpper-middle
Ecsta HS52
7.6
Better at: Dry handling, Dry braking
Worse at: Aquaplaning - cross, Wet braking
FirestoneUpper-middle
Roadhawk
6.0
Better at: Aquaplaning - cross, Dry braking
Worse at: Mileage, Comfort
HankookPremium
Ventus Prime 4
7.6
Better at: Dry braking, Dry handling
Worse at: Wet braking, Aquaplaning - cross

Pros & Cons

Strengths

Efficient performance, contributing to improved fuel economy and overall effectiveness.

Weaknesses

Lacks balanced performance across both dry and wet road conditions.

Exhibits high abrasion resulting in a relatively short lifespan.

Demonstrates suboptimal environmental performance and sustainability.

Reviews

8.0
69 Reviews

Customers like

Low noise level
Excellent value for money
All-season convenience
price

History

2015
1× Tested
Autobild215/65 R16#2Exemplary
2016
1× Tested
Autobild205/55 R16#29
2018
1× Tested
Autobild195/65 R15#22
2021
3× Tested
ADAC205/55 R16#6Satisfactory
Autobild205/55 R16#21
Autobild205/55 R16#30
2023
2× Tested
Autoklub ČR205/55 R16#14
ADAC205/55 R16#27Good
Price vs Quality
Size:

Tests (8)

All test results →
8 Tests 3× Recommended
Autoklub ČR Summer
205/55 R16
#14 Of 19 Tyres
ADAC Summer
205/55 R16
#27 Of 50 Tyres
ADAC Summer
205/55 R16
#6 Of 15 Tyres
ADAC2021
6thSatisfactory
VW Golf
Read test →
Autobild Summer
205/55 R16
#21 Of 53 Tyres
Autobild Winter
205/55 R16
#30 Of 50 Tyres
Autobild Winter
195/65 R15
#22 Of 51 Tyres
Autobild Summer
205/55 R16
#29 Of 50 Tyres

Sizes (28)

2 Variants

82H
185/65 R14From £73

2 Variants

86H
tyres-pneus-online.co.ukBest£73
Compare prices

Ratings

Tested By professional organizations

Exemplary1× (33%)
Good1× (33%)
Satisfactory1× (33%)

Performance by size

205/xx Rxx 9.0215/xx Rxx 10.0

Other Apollo models

View all →

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.