Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 has A wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has B rating.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | 120 | 104 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||