Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 146 | 134 | ||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 91 | 113 | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 120 | 104 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||