Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Tristar (1%). The first tyre test of Tristar Snowpower HP was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowpower HP and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Tristar Snowpower HP
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R12 - R16 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
Tristar Snowpower HP | 43,2 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
Tristar Snowpower HP Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,5 | 2,2 | 4,3 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | dobré | 1,3 | 2,1 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |