Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Kleber Dynaxer HP4 are both summer tyres from renowned manufacturers, Sava and Kleber respectively. While both these tyres serve the purpose of providing a safe and comfortable ride during warmer months, their performance varies in many aspects based on the data provided.
The Sava Intensa UHP 2 is a replacement for the previous model, the Sava Intensa UHP. It scores 67% in our rating, showcasing significant improvements over its predecessor. It performs well in autobild tests, securing the 7th position among 21 tyres for its excellent safety reserves at Aquaplaning, stable handling on dry roads, short braking distances both on dry and wet surfaces, and good overall comfort. However, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 is noted for having a limited tyre lifespan.
On the other hand, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scores significantly higher in our rating, at 76%, and is not a replacement for any previous model. It ranks 13th out of 21 tyres in the Autobild test, where it was appreciated for its comfort. While it performed well on wet and dry braking distances with good Aquaplaning properties, it fell short in areas such as wet grip and delayed steering response.
The Sava Intensa UHP 2 managed to secure the 2nd position among 9 tyres during ACE test, thanks to its exceptional performance in dry handling and exterior noise. On the other hand, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 positioned at 6th with its highlight being its low exterior noise.
When tested by ADAC, both tyres showcased their strengths on a dry road, but revealed their weaknesses on wet surfaces, also indicating a slightly increased tyre wear. In the end, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 took 11th position among 17 tyres, being one notch above Sava Intensa UHP 2 which landed on 12th position.
To sum it up, while Sava Intensa UHP 2 offers valuable features and proves to be a good choice in dry conditions and noise level, it falls a bit short in its lifespan. In contrast, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 performs better overall, excelling in comfort and fuel efficiency. However, it requires improvements in its grip on wet roads. Therefore, the choice between these two depends on the individual priorities of the driver.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.312. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 45 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
