Segment
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Tristar (1%). The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Tristar Snowpower HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the Snowpower HP were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Tristar Snowpower HP | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R12 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 71 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
Tristar Snowpower HP | 43,2 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Tristar Snowpower HP Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 2,2 | 4,3 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |