• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Falken Azenis FK510

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nokian (57%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a better rating of 74% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2018 225/45 R17 test, where both the zLine and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings.

# Nokian zLine
/37%
Falken Azenis FK510
/74%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR16 - R21 R17 - R99
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Points totalWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,49,89,310
Nokian zLine7,88,07,39,0
Falken Azenis FK5108,59,27,58,6
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test1505539147
Nokian zLine
Rating: Recommended
1496347187
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Recommended
150 6646169
Show test details
Name WetDry
Best values in test2+1-
Nokian zLine
Rating: Good
22
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Good
22
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,134,6
Nokian zLine36,140,2
Falken Azenis FK51035,534,8
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test2781461432510
Nokian zLine240119121229
Falken Azenis FK5102441141301610
Show test details