Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Sava Eskimo HP2 has a better rating of 75% compared to 57% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 57% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating. We also know where WR Snowproof is made - Finland/Russian Federation.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.072. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB2. Sava Eskimo HP2 71 dB
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 3,2 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,0 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 1,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||