• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 has a better rating of 60% compared to 57% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and Winter Sottozero 3 is made in Italy.

# Nokian WR Snowproof
/57%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
/60%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20 R17 - R99
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,51,91,82,32,60,81,8
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,52,52,72,72,02,1
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Satisfactory
2,33,02,62,73,42,52,3
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+11-
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Good
2-2-2+2-
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Satisfactory
22-3+3+
Show test details
Name Points total
Best values in test8,9
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
6,2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Good
7,0
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
Nokian WR Snowproof32,224,6
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 331,326,4
Show test details