Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 46% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea.
# | Nokian WR Snowproof
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | Not available in 255/35 R18 (change) | Not available in 255/35 R18 (change) | |
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 3,2 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,7 | |||||
Show test details |