• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 57% compared to 47% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea.

# Nokian WR Snowproof
/57%
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
/47%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20 R13 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWear
Best values in test1,61,91,92,02,62,0
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
3,32,52,32,22,92,5
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Rating: Sufficient
3,03,62,52,42,73,0
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Nokian WR Snowproof36,529,2
Kumho WinterCraft WP5137,829,8
Show test details