Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 57% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (73%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Snow acceleration
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB