Segment
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 has a better rating of 96% compared to 62% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (52%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
