Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Falken Azenis FK520
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 5
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let's compare the performances of Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Falken Azenis FK520, leading tyres produced by Michelin and Falken, respectively. Both tyres belong to the Ultra-Ultra High Performance (UUHP) subCategory and are summer models. Each of these tyres has a strong lineage in the market, with previous models like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and 3, and the Falken Azenis FK510.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 with a high rating of 97% is fabled for its comprehensive performances in tyre tests. The tyre has demonstrated its superiority by securing high positions in tests conducted by Autozeitung, ADAC, ACE, and Autobild, wherein the tyre excels in wet circle cornering and Aquaplaning - crosswise. The text summaries from these testing bodies identify the tyre's strengths in balanced features on dry and wet roads, high predicted mileage, low wear, low weight, and low fuel consumption. One key negative identified was its mild weakness in lateral aquaplaning behavior.
Falken Azenis FK520
The Falken Azenis FK520, made in Turkey, performs commendably in tests with an overall rating of 75%. The tyre has shown good results in the same series of tests, although slightly lower than its Michelin counterpart. Strengths include good overall performance on dry and wet roads, high projected mileage, low wear, and low fuel consumption. The test summaries pointed out minor weaknesses in dry road driving comfort, lateral aquaplaning behavior, wet handling, and slightly increased weight.
When summarizing the test data, it is evident that both tyres perform well in different aspects. The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stands out overall in test scores, as it performs exceptionally well in wet weather conditions, particularly in the realm of wet circle cornering and crosswise aquaplaning. In contrast, the Falken Azenis FK520 demonstrates good overall performance in both dry and wet conditions, despite minor weaknesses.
Moving to the final verdict, if performance in wet conditions is your primary concern, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is the better choice. However, if your focus is more on balanced performance in both wet and dry conditions, the Falken Azenis FK520 would be deemed a good choice. In terms of ratings, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has a slight edge over Falken Azenis FK520.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 260 | 132 | 128 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: - | 219 | 102 | 117 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,9 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 71 | 54 | 19 | 7 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 70 | 50 | 18 | 5 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Recommended | 60 | 50 | 17 | 6 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 60.1 | 26 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 60.7 | 27 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
