Segment
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost2. Goodride SW612 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van vs. Goodride SW612
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Matador winter tyres are slightly better rated (33%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and Goodride SW612, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and the SW612 were tested.
| # | Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Goodride SW612
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R12 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Goodride SW612 Rating: Not recommended | 3,1 | 3,6 | 4,9 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
