Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn I Fit LW31 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Laufenn (48%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 72% compared to 19% of the Laufenn I Fit LW31. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the I Fit LW31 and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Laufenn I Fit LW31 | Michelin ALPIN 6 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| Laufenn I Fit LW31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 3,0 | |
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | ||||||
| Laufenn I Fit LW31 | 39,4 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 30,4 | 24,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||