• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has a better rating of 59% compared to 54% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP71. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the Pilot Alpin PA4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 also have C wet ratings.

# Kumho WinterCraft WP71
/54%
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
/59%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR16 - R19 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-21-
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Rating: Satisfactory
3-2- 1-
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Good
22 2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Rating: Still recommended
7,17,87,86,5
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Recommended
7,78,18,47,2
Show test details