Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 has a better rating of 75% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WinterCraft WP52 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | ||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 37.8 | 29.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 2,0 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,7 | ||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,7 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 35,3 | 26,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||