Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (61%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 61% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 37.5 | 29.4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
Show test details |