Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP51 vs. Tristar Snowpower HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Tristar (1%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Tristar Snowpower HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the Snowpower HP were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WinterCraft WP51 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | Tristar Snowpower HP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R12 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
| Tristar Snowpower HP | 43,2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 38,8 | 28 | |||||
| Tristar Snowpower HP | 42 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||