Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 69% compared to 47% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | Firestone Winterhawk 4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 | 33,5 | 28,6 | |||||
Show test details |