Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho PorTran KC53 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS51
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Kumho, which is a brand from South Korea. In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 has a better rating of 45% compared to 30% of the Kumho PorTran KC53. The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran KC53 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS51 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 has B rating.
| # | Kumho PorTran KC53
| Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 ? dB