Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho PorTran KC53 vs. Kumho Ecowing ES31
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Kumho, which is a brand from South Korea. In this particular case, the Kumho Ecowing ES31 has a better rating of 65% compared to 30% of the Kumho PorTran KC53. The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran KC53 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating.
| # | Kumho PorTran KC53
| Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 70 dB