Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Toyo Celsius AS2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Toyo (48%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 73% compared to 59% of the Toyo Celsius AS2. The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Toyo Celsius AS2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the HA32 Solus 4S and the Celsius AS2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the HA32 Solus 4S is made in China and Celsius AS2 is made in Japan.
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | Toyo Celsius AS2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.782. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.43
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Toyo Celsius AS2 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.9 | 50.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 43,5 | 53,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||