Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the Ecsta PS91 and the zLine were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian zLine has A rating. We also know where Ecsta PS91 is made - Korea.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
2. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
2. Nokian zLine 60%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 93%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,3 | vysoce doporučeno | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | ||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | ||
Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | doporučeno | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | ||
Show test details |