Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 has a better rating of 76% compared to 68% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 and the Dynaxer HP4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.332. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||