Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Gt Radial Fe2
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Gt Radial Fe2 are two very different tyres, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Let's have a closer look at how they perform in tests.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52, a successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, is a touring summer tyre. In Autobild's test, it won 2nd position out of 55 tyres. Its best features include dry braking, dry handling and wet braking. The tyre reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with convincing performance on both wet and dry roads, and short braking distances. The only disadvantage is its mediocre rolling comfort. However, we rate the Kumho Ecsta HS52 at 78%, making it an excellent choice for those looking for reliable, high-performance summer tyres.
On the other hand, the Gt Radial Fe2 is a Ultra High Performance (UHP) tyre. It secured the 19th position in Autobild's test. The reviewers appreciated its secure aquaplaning performance and short dry braking distance. However, they noted average grip on both wet and dry roads. These mixed reviews suggest that the Gt Radial Fe2 may not be suitable for those who frequently drive in rainy weather.
In mutual tests, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 consistently outperforms the Gt Radial Fe2. However, the latter's impressive performance in dry conditions makes it a decent option for those living in areas with a predominantly dry climate. It is worth noting that the Gt Radial Fe2 did not receive a rating from us, hence, a fair comparison with the Kumho Ecsta HS52 might not be possible.
It is evident from the tests that the Kumho Ecsta HS52 delivers superior performance overall. It excels in both dry and wet conditions, making it a safer, more balanced option for drivers. The Gt Radial Fe2 performs impressively in dry conditions but falls short in wet environments, thus being a decent tyre with some limitations.
In conclusion, while both tyres have their respective strengths, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is the more versatile and reliable choice overall. Meanwhile, the Gt Radial Fe2 may be suitable for those who prioritise dry performance over wet grip.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Gt Radial Fe2 68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Wet braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 | 37,4 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 1 | |||||
| GT Radial FE2 | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,7 | 2,3 | ||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,0 | 2,9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
