Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we will be comparing two touring, summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005. Both are recommended for their consistency and performance in various conditions. However, each tyre possesses unique features that set them apart.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a successor to the popular HS51 model and holds a commendable site rating of 78%. According to Autoklub ČR and Autobild, the HS52 excels in dry braking and offers an excellent price to performance ratio. Despite its strengths, TyreReviews reports a few weaknesses including environmental balance, efficiency and sustainability. On comparing with others, it secured the 13th position among 19 tyres in Autoklub ČR and 8th among 50 tyres in ADAC. This model has been discontinued and is replaced by a newer tyre model.
On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza T005, manufactured in facilities across Europe, boasts an impressive site rating of 92%. This Bridgestone tyre stands out in tests, especially when it comes to rolling resistance and wet circle cornering. In addition, AutoBild praised its exceptional performance in terms of dry and wet braking, wet circle cornering and wet handling. Although TyreReviews.com 2023 noticed no particular weaknesses, autobild 2022 mentions a limited lifespan. On comparing with others, in Autoklub ČR, Turanza T005 secured the 3rd position out of 19 tyres, and in ADAC, it secured the 4th position out of 50 tyres.
In summary, both Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Bridgestone Turanza T005 delivered consistent performances, yet with some notable differences. While the Kumho tyre offers excellent dry braking and value for money, the Bridgestone tyre shined in terms of grip and handling, both on wet and dry surfaces. On the downside, Kumho falls short in environmental impact, and Bridgestone shows a limited lifespan.
All analysis considered, the comprehensive tests place Bridgestone Turanza T005 at a higher position overall, due to its superior ability, balance and definitely worth considering despite its lifespan limitation. However, if budget constraints are a factor, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 may be a commendable alternative.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 96,9 | 94,3 | 99,5 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 102,4 | 101,3 | 103,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended | vysoce doporučeno | 1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,7 | 2,3 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,4 | 2,2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | |||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | dobré | 1 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
