Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Our comparison on Kleber Dynaxer UHP and Falken Azenis FK510 reveals some key differences that can help consumers make informed decisions on which tyre to choose for summer usage.
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP is a summer tyre with a significant track record but has no previous models. With an overall rating of 68%, it offers decent performance for a variety of vehicles. However, in terms of ranking in mutual tests, it holds the 15th position out of 53 tyres in the Autobild test. This model has not been replaced and continues to serve as a reliable option for many drivers.
On the other hand, the Falken Azenis FK510, also a summer tyre, boasts a slightly higher our rating score of 74%. It is manufactured in Japan and Turkey, suggesting a solid build quality. As per Autobild test results, the Azenis FK510 proudly holds the 6th position, performing remarkably better than the Dynaxer UHP. Its strengths lie in its superior exterior noise level, excellent price/value ratio, and outstanding rolling resistance. Consumers looking for these specific features in a tyre should give FK510 serious consideration. It should be noted that this model has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520, which we would suggest checking out for more updated tyre technology.
In summary, while the Kleber Dynaxer UHP offers a decent performance overall, the Falken Azenis FK510 shines in select areas such as exterior noise level, price/value ratio, and rolling resistance. Additionally, the FK510 outperforms the Dynaxer UHP in terms of ranking in mutual tests, making it a more attractive option for discerning customers. Nonetheless, both tyres offer solid options for summer usage, and the choice ultimately boils down to specific individual preferences and requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
