Segment
1. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost2. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 vs. Viking Protech NewGen
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Kenda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Viking (25%). In this particular case, the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 has a better rating of 69% compared to 35% of the Viking Protech NewGen. The first tyre test of Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Viking Protech NewGen first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kenetica Pro KR210 and the Protech NewGen were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | Viking Protech NewGen | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,4 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | 2,5 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||