Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kenda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 81% compared to 69% of the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210. The first tyre test of Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kenetica Pro KR210 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | 38,6 | 31,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,4 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||