Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (31%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 has a better rating of 59% compared to 34% of the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/35 R19 test, where both the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and the Advan Sport V105 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R19 | R16 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 1,9 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 225 | 102 | 123 | 17 | 10 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 209 | 93 | 116 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 266,5 | 187,9 | 63,2 | 96,1 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 97,7 | 287,2 | 191,5 | 77,9 | 100 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 96,1 | 290,2 | 193,3 | 63,2 | 98,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||