Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Nokian zLine
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (57%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 has a better rating of 59% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 235/45 R18 test, where both the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and the zLine were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | Nokian zLine | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian zLine ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 146 | 65 | 46 | 15 | 9 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 149 | 63 | 47 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 1,9 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 225 | 102 | 123 | 17 | 10 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 8,9 | 8,8 | 7,9 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||