• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (31%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 72% compared to 46% of the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Advan Fleva V701 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.

# Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
/72%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
/46%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R20 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-1-1
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Rating: Exemplary
2+2+2
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Rating: Conditionally recommended
3+2+2
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,134,6
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K12534,335,7
Yokohama Advan Fleva V70134,940,2
Show test details