Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Nokian Line
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Nokian Line | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will be looking at two popular summer tyres: the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Nokian Line. Both tyres have been subject to various tests, and we will be summarizing their strengths and weaknesses based on the results.
The Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 is a summer tyre made in Hungary, with an our rating of 88%. It comes as the first equipment for the Citroën C3 Aircross. Although this tyre has been replaced by the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, it still offers excellent performance. In the Autobild test, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 ranked 2nd out of 50 tyres and excelled in dry handling. On the other hand, it held the 14th position in the ADAC test out of 16 tyres.
When it comes to the Nokian Line, this Finland-made summer tyre has an our rating of 76%. It doesn't come as first equipment for any specific car models. Unlike the Hankook tyre, the Nokian Line does not have a newer model that has replaced it. In the Autobild test, the Nokian Line secured the 14th position out of 50 tyres. However, in the ADAC test, it performed better as it achieved the 7th position out of 16 tyres.
Comparing the two tyres, it's evident that the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a higher overall rating and performed better in terms of dry handling according to the Autobild test. In contrast, the Nokian Line outperformed the Hankook tyre in the ADAC test, claiming a higher position in the overall ranking.
Considering their respective strengths and weaknesses, if your main priority is excellent dry handling, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 may be the better choice for you. However, if you are looking for a more balanced overall performance based on the ADAC test, the Nokian Line could be the right tyre to suit your needs.
In conclusion, it's essential to consider your priorities and driving conditions when choosing between these two summer tyres. Both Hankook and Nokian are well-established tyre manufacturers with a solid reputation, so regardless of your choice, you can expect a reliable and high-quality product.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 87%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 69%
Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 63%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian Line ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Nokian Line Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
| Nokian Line | 37,5 | 38 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 3,3 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Nokian Line Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 3,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Nokian Line Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Nokian Line | 37,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||