Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Kumho Ecowing ES31
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 72% compared to 65% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Kumho Ecowing ES31 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||