Segment
1. GT radial Sport Active 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, GT summer tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Linglong (44%). In this particular case, the Linglong Sport Master has a better rating of 72% compared to 39% of the GT radial Sport Active 2. The first tyre test of GT radial Sport Active 2 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the radial Sport Active 2 and the Sport Master were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | GT radial Sport Active 2
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GT radial Sport Active 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
1. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory2. GT radial Sport Active 2 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
GT Radial Sport Active 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Gt Radial Sport Active 2 | 63.3 | 27.3 | |||||
Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
Show test details |