Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Gt Radial Fe2
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let's start by comparing two distinct tyres, the Gt Radial Fe2 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. Neither of these tyres have replaced any previous models, hence they are unique offerings from their respective manufacturers.
The Gt Radial Fe2 is a UHP type tyre, unfortunately we do not have an assigned rating for this tyre. Based on Autobild test results, the Gt Radial Fe2 shows secure aquaplaning properties, coupled with shorter dry braking distances. Despite its strong performance, it has average grip on both wet and dry tracks (Durchschnittlicher Grip auf nasser und trockener Piste). In the recent 2024 Autobild testing, its performance on dry roads and efficiency were appreciated but it's not well-balanced, showing weaknesses on wet roads. Its low sustainability score and short lifespan were also marked as areas of concern.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is a summer tyre, which got a solid 76% rating from our team. It secured the 12th position in both Autobild and ADAC tests, outranking the Gt Radial Fe2. Noteworthy features of this tyre are its comfort and low exterior noise. The Autobild 2022 test emphasizes its good aquaplaning properties, short wet and dry braking distance and comfortable, quiet ride. The negatives mentioned for the Dynaxer HP4 include slightly underwhelming grip on wet surfaces and a noticeably delayed steering response. Yet, in Autobild 2024, this tyre did well with its environmental balance, mileage, wear and efficiency but still pointed out as it's not quite balanced with some issues on wet surfaces.
In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 seems to outperform the Gt Radial Fe2 in several aspects, particularly in comfort, noise level, and being more efficient. Both tyres however, struggle with wet road performance and need to improve in grip and overall balance. In head-to-head comparison tests, the Kleber tyre consistently ranked higher than the Gt Radial, making it the recommended choice between the two.
For more information, you can visit the tyre manufacturers directly: GT Radial, Kleber Tyres.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 68%
Wet braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 | 37,4 | 29,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,0 | 2,9 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,1 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
