Segment
2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Imperial (7%). The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Imperial SnowDragon UHP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the SnowDragon UHP were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | Imperial SnowDragon UHP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 35,5 | 25,5 | |||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 1 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||