Segment
2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 has a better rating of 61% compared to 47% of the Nokian WR A4. The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Nokian WR A4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 and the WR A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Nokian WR A4 also have B wet ratings.
# | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 | Nokian WR A4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
1. Nokian WR A4 72 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 203 | 69 | 65 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Recommended | 199 | 66 | 63 | 42 | 15 | 8 | |
Nokian WR A4 Rating: Recommended | 187 | 64 | 45 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
Show test details |