Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Goodride Sport SA-37 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride Sport SA-37 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Goodride (49%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Satin has a better rating of 43% compared to 3% of the Goodride Sport SA-37. The first tyre test of Goodride Sport SA-37 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Satin first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Sport SA-37 and the Ultrac Satin were tested.
| # | Goodride Sport SA-37 | Vredestein Ultrac Satin | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Goodride Sport SA-37 | 174 | 73 | 101 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Highly recommended | 222 | 109 | 113 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||