Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Nokian Line
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nokian (57%). In this particular case, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 has a better rating of 79% compared to 35% of the Nokian Line. The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Fulda EcoControl HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Line has A rating.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP2 | Nokian Line | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.172. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB2. Nokian Line ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian Line 80%
Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%